Jon K.
Active Member
So far as "indoor trainer routine", it's pretty simple for me. Do some stretching, put on my shoes and gloves, grab a towel for sweat duty, get on, clip in, start the pedals turning and turn OFF the brain until the timer on the iPhone signals 45 minutes. (Actually did 50 minutes last night so I could claim 500+ "total calories" burned.)I admire folks who can do the indoor trainer routine. I have a set of rollers that I used for a while back when I raced a bit, and a Serotta fit bike with a magnetic resistance gizmo. I don't get beyond thinking about dragging one of them out for actual use.
What is your perceived effort in the 110-120 heart beat range? When I used a monitor my average on road rides would be in the 150 bpm range.
Hm, I'm not good at judging "perceived effort." I would say that I'm in Zone 2, based on the "if you can talk, but someone would know that you're exercising" measure. However, the Apple Watch thinks my max heart rate is 163 (where it got that number, I'm not sure) and the heart rate reserve calculations - 70 to 80 percent of (max hr - resting) + resting - would give me a Zone 2 range of 132 to 142 bpm.
I think the highest I've touched on the trainer is 124 beats per minute. You have to remember, I'm a 65-year-old late-to-workouts guy who has had two heart attacks, an ICD implanted in my chest due to the heart attacks reducing my ejection fraction to around 35% (on the borderline for a-fib), and pulmonary embolisms in both lungs at the same time. I consider pushing my heart rate over 110 bpm pretty darn good under the circumstances. My GP and cardiologist have told me to "keep doing what you're doing."
I really can't afford a Wahoo Kickr or Tacx Neo 2T or one of the other fancy direct-drive smart trainers. I could afford a wheel-on smart trainer, but since I'm not really interested in "social cycling" indoors, I'd probably best be served by cadence and speed sensors.
Last edited: